If that is what I said, I misspoke. I don't think of philosophy as JUST a worldview either, but at the VERY least, should INFORM one's worldview.
If you don't . . . agitate about the ways/whys shit works, I am not sure you (a person) HAVE a worldview so much as . . . possessed by one. Like the addict - at a certain point you have to wonder: are you smoking the xyz or is it smoking you?
One either ACQUIRES a worldview (culture, socialization) or BUILDS one. (and then introspects DEEPLY (hopefully) when he finds his actions don't exactly match his . . . cogitations :-)
I assume you intend to continue this series on into (more of) your conception of the science of philosophy - I look forward to it.
RE: Applied Ethics: Human Experimentation. Yeah or nah?