Ladies and gentlemen,
How can intelligent people be so gullible and inexplicably deceived?
Today, I stand before you not to deny that our planet changes or that humans have an impact on their environment, but to challenge the narrative that a climate emergency is upon us and that humanity is solely to blame. I believe it is not only our right but our duty to question the claims made in the name of science when they are used to justify sweeping policy changes, economic controls, and the erosion of individual freedoms.
What we've witnessed over the past few decades is not simply a concern for the environment but a global movement that increasingly resembles a political and economic agenda. The repeated calls for urgent action, the suppression of dissenting views, and the constant portrayal of worst-case scenarios are not hallmarks of objective science, but of propaganda.
In 1992 we had the first ever Earth Summit - where the world came together to recognize our collective duty to the environment. From that point onwards the world's leaders introduced measures to reduce CFCs, to repair the hole in the ozone layer and limit industrial pollution that caused acid rain and other environmental damage.
Since that time the world has taken significant strides in ensuring human impact on the environment is kept to a minimum. Then suddenly we have a climate emergency on our hands. It wasn't gradual, it wasn't a developing process, it came out of nowhere and we all need to panic. If it doesn't sound right and it doesn't feel right then it usually isn't right. Something is wrong here.
We’re told the science is settled. But when was science ever settled? Real science invites scepticism. Real science evolves through debate, through testing, through challenge. And yet, many respected voices including scientists, economists, and journalists who question the climate consensus are silenced, censored, or ridiculed.
Follow the money. From carbon markets to green subsidies, there is a massive financial incentive to keep the alarm bells ringing. The global climate narrative, in my view, is less about saving the Earth and more about redistributing power—economic, political, and even personal.
Let us not be forced into poverty, rising costs, and restrictive policies without honest debate. Let us stand for transparency, for critical thinking, and for real environmental stewardship—not one manufactured in boardrooms and parroted by politicians with something to gain.
I call for open debate, for accountability, and for the freedom to question what we’re told. Because truth does not fear scrutiny—and if the climate agenda is as urgent and unquestionable as we’re told, then it should be able to withstand it.
Thank you.
Peace!