Yes, incorporating multiple thiings into a proposal complicates things. But some things need to go together, we cant have a vote for RF and another for GF for example.
That being said, the GF/RF distribution can be discussed in another proposal.
The elimination of alpha and the increase for modern rewards (reb+cl) was the main issue this proposal is trying to tackle.
Is does not. The gating mechanism remains unchanged. This means that you will be able to play 1 league up and 1 league down. Thats not changing, there are other proposals that intend to change that but this is not it.
What happened to wild silver tournaments is a mistake already recogniced by clayborn.
Classic is very controversial but it was a compromise to "alpha holders" to try to keep them happy. But it could be removed and just add that pool to wild. Nobody is really happy about classic because it was just that, a compromise.
Thats probably an error and thats why we have preproposals. That can be corrected.
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Update Tournament Formatting and Reward Allocations