On the one hand, you acknowledge that you wouldn't further investigate something that's own representative made to sound like a scam, but on the other hand chastise me for not doing so. Why would I assume a person representing this initiative was wrong and I should check it out more before writing my post? I honestly shouldn't. Beyond that, from what you have explained, it seems a handful of curators get compensation and participants get exposure. I genuinely do not think that is worthwhile, and I am entitled to my opinion. I am relatively new here as well and you're making it seem like I should just know to 1. not believe your own representative 2. should know how to track the things you've mentioned - AGAIN: I didn't make "accusations", I gave my opinion on this initiative based on what one of your own representatives indicated to me. This wasn't "one persons comments about it", this was a person who is supposed to be knowledgeable and representing your initiative accurately. I love how that person was wrong but you are wagging your finger at me. There ARE other projects I have seen that are doing what I am stating, but I do NOT feel compelled or obligated to go searching for things I dismissed as a waste over a month ago. So far, my experience with now two representatives of your page leave me feeling frustrated, for what it's worth. As someone new here, I'd rather not deal with it. How am I supposed to know who has or has not complained? I also still don't get how "big vote supporters" is supposed to mean anything to someone new. I would urge you to, as a leader of this page, write out with some clarity what you do and how it benefits the content creator, and what happens with the funds you earn. You can't be upset people don't understand when your own team misrepresents you, and then scold confused people who feel like they were dealing with someone trying to poach their content. I mean really.