I recently started contributing to the Steem Center ( ) which is the wiki of all the things STEEM. If things turn well, I will invite my #diehardsteemit members to this gig as well.
Literary a contributors on the Steem.Center are building a page together. And it is a paid gig. We share the reward.
PLEASE READ THIS TO THE END BEFORE YOU BOUNCE THERE COMPLETELY UNINFORMED.
Now, this morning while I was drinking coffee an idea crossed my mind.
You see, the wiki article I made there about DSound was edited and formatted by somebody else.
Because the reward cut was never determined, I guess that contributors share an equal part.
The problem is NOT if the article was edited with substantial information and content.
The problem is if it was edited by bolding text and adding a few more links in the reference area, so practically ALL THE MINOR CHANGES.
In other words, a writer can make an official-size wiki-article ( which is usually around 2000 words plus) and somebody will come, put a bold text, a link and claim 50%.
A person apparently doesn't need to write anything. In the original text which I made, one sentence was put as an addition, which once again adds absolutely nothing to the content.
I want to know, how are calculating rewards ( and I want to put a decision how it should be calculated on a public vote) because I am sure the others are wondering the same thing.
We all get an upvote from the official account, that part is fine, but a major question remains.
If it is 50%/50% that does not favor my part of the work, and I am not willing to contribute under those conditions because I find them rock bottom unfair.
I placed a comment and a question under their article Announcing a new wiki article about DSound created, one about Steemit Chat updated and new donation received and I will be expecting their answer, hopefully, it will be reassuring for the writers and most of all fair.