Login
Discover
Waves
Decks
Plus
Login
Signup
CNACWS
@cnacws
47
Cooperative, NonAgressive Communication with Statists (CNACWS).
Followers
73
Following
8
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Location
USA
Created
March 1, 2018
RSS Feed
Subscribe
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
cnacws
censorship
2018-03-25 17:27
RE: YouTube banning all gun videos in latest censorship assault on liberty… but a new video site welcoming gun videos launches soon
I read YouTube's policy, and I don't think it will affect video games at all, HOWEVER, Germany and other places have Gewaltverherrlichung and Strafgesetzbuch laws that prohibit glorification of violence,
$ 0.000
0
cnacws
psychology
2018-03-25 17:14
RE: An Introduction To Nonviolent Communication (Selection From My Book)
I am a big fan of Marshall Rosenberg, and nonviolent communication (NVC) is the central part of my approach. I'm new on Steemit, but I am building resources and guides to see if I can help people learn
$ 0.000
1
cnacws
politics
2018-03-25 08:47
RE: UBI: Unemployed funding the 1%
so i think we are on the same page for regulations that outlaw cookies and ice cream (personal health risk), but your concern was that part of the effect of jaywalking was harm to others (risk of causing
$ 0.000
0
1
cnacws
voluntaryism
2018-03-25 08:06
RE: Fear of Voluntaryism due to Statist Thinking
I don't want to appear as a troll. You are not a troll. I like when people tolerate my pedantic psychobabble. The statement assumes that I already agree that peaceful people are currently being forced
$ 0.000
0
1
cnacws
politics
2018-03-24 19:01
RE: UBI: Unemployed funding the 1%
All hypothetical. Your anti-jaywalking law (and other laws against peaceful people) allow for NO liberty under any hypothetical. That is the point of liberty: I make my decisions about my risk or enjoyment
$ 0.000
0
3
cnacws
politics
2018-03-24 15:20
RE: UBI: Unemployed funding the 1%
If I force adults to cross the road only at pedestrian crossings, how does that harm them? loss of liberty greater harm for those who don't obey (jail, shoot-out with the cops, police brutality for someone
$ 0.000
0
5
cnacws
politics
2018-03-24 07:16
RE: UBI: Unemployed funding the 1%
Hi adigitallife, Forcing someone to do something doesn't necessarily harm them only ethical people should be allowed to define harm. Your example was of a baby. I usually confine my discussions to sane
$ 0.000
0
7
cnacws
politics
2018-03-23 17:54
RE: UBI: Unemployed funding the 1%
My first question is, why do you make so many assumptions? I'm not sure which assumptions you mean. Next, do you expect voluntarism to just be a switch in society with an overnight shift in personal and
$ 0.000
0
1
cnacws
politics
2018-03-23 16:45
RE: UBI: Unemployed funding the 1%
So what you are saying is the rich should stay rich and the poor should get poorer until they are so poor thru are homeless, and all because you believe it harms the rich to pay more taxes Those are related
$ 0.000
0
1
cnacws
politics
2018-03-23 15:58
RE: UBI: Unemployed funding the 1%
Maybe my analogy was a distraction. I was addressing your claim that nobody suffers from implementing a universal basic income. If everybody volunteers to pay into the system, that is fine, but every UBI
$ 0.000
0
16
cnacws
politics
2018-03-23 15:09
RE: UBI: Unemployed funding the 1%
So, who suffers? Well, no one really You suffer because you are selling your commitment to the most basic principle that underlies any system of ethics: you ignore the principle of not harming peaceful
$ 0.000
0
18
cnacws
earth
2018-03-23 07:07
RE: Warming Earth
Giant UpVote for your conclusion: . Everyone need to begin making changes from themselves first before pointing finger at others .
$ 0.000
1
cnacws
steemit
2018-03-23 07:02
RE: YouTube Announces Authoritarian Ban on Gun Videos So Users Turn to Steemit, Pornhub
Yes. I see this as a big problem, but I'm not sure what the best response is. You can talk about Steemit, but the truth is that kids today live on YouTube, and they will not have a chance to be exposed
$ 0.000
0
cnacws
anarchy
2018-03-21 19:27
RE: "So What's Your Plan?"
So, going to the meetings is just an exercise in frustration They are frustrated and angry and focussed upon what they think is the problem. They are not receptive to radical shifts of perspective. I have
$ 0.000
0
cnacws
anarchy
2018-03-21 17:13
RE: "So What's Your Plan?"
A huge percentage of my time and energy over the past two decades has been focused on changing people’s minds, via articles, videos, public talks, my books Would people here oppose thousands of people
$ 0.000
0
3
cnacws
anarchism
2018-03-19 07:21
RE: DEBATE: Adam Kokesh v. Graham Smith on The Efficacy and Ethics of Political Crusading
Governments at all levels are such a colossal mess, and the ongoing social welfare programs have created such a colossal problem, that I suspect that nobody can devise a philosophical pure way to dig us
$ 0.000
0
cnacws
capitalism
2018-03-18 19:24
RE: Capitalism is a blight, Cooperatives are the future.
I see now that you were not trying to use your observations as justifications to do things against the will of other peaceful people. I made some big edits above and put notes in what and modified. There
$ 0.000
0
cnacws
capitalism
2018-03-18 18:34
RE: Capitalism is a blight, Cooperatives are the future.
I suspect that you will find my post here to be frustrating, foreign, and confusing. These are some of the things that I experienced when I tried to work through the rationality of my enviornmental beliefs
$ 0.000
1
2
cnacws
philosophy
2018-03-18 17:56
RE: To Change The World You Must Change Within #12
I have never heard of psychological time. Some things that I can think of that are related to time and psychology: the perception of time time passes when you are thinking you can think about the past,
$ 0.000
0
1
cnacws
anarchism
2018-03-18 07:11
RE: Thoughts on Anarchism and Capitalism. Looking for Input and Critique.
Much of your reply indicates that you interpret the "should" in this sentence differently from me: Rather, the individual should be free of oppressive influence which may hinder the individual
$ 0.000
0