I am not debating the election process, you miss the entire point of the meme. The write-in vote of 'No Confidence' is simply a show of rejection. If you study history you will find a consensus as far

It's more a matter of the two parties being at the root of the corruption, one only has to casually investigate to see that the parties serve the big donors who both parties have enabled to shower them

There needs to be more focus by the hacktivest community to target such individuals... also a word of warning, most movements are infiltrated and co-opted as soon as they display the least threat or are

"A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would

Thank you for the information...

Perhaps you should try following people back... I know I've been around the world of activism for many years and go with a quid pro quo approach, I'm no better than any other and for me to follow someone

I don't know whether or not Steemit will be responsible, maybe complicit would be a better choice of words... but we can hope and try to advance it happening if possible... :)