I also find this vote rather strange. There are others Projects which are even more questionable like Collatz - there is no properly maintained list about all investigated numbers. And it will never proove

I could not care less. Can you please add some content with archival value. I can get such statistics from your CPID (or any other peoples CPID). This is just spam and clouds the relevant gridcoin content.

Those 200USD are calculated taking into account your investment in the infrastructure (Computers, cooling, maintenance) and electricity costs? Or do you have access to the computing power and the investment

At least i can agree with the observation that the there seems to less rewards. For me i did assigned more CPU into my projects, but i received less coins. I thought this was related to more competition

Great we settled this!

Sorry, i did not make clear that understand how GRC works. Actually i earned my first GRC in 2015. Thats why i wanted to point out that we should also try to establish GRC as usable currency. Not only

Hello, i would like to point out that a practical, widespread and usable crypto currency needs to fulfill 3 criteria: 1.) Low transaction cost - e.g. to buy a pizza without large addition costs 2.) Stable

Thank you for the good analysis regarding the RAC. I noticed that WCG only granted me 1 valid task per day and machine over the Xmax days - even though all my 4 machines when crunching full time. Maybe

Hello, i would like to point out that a practical, widespread and usable crypto currency needs to fulfill 3 criteria: 1.) Low transaction cost - e.g. to buy a pizza without large addition costs 2.) Stable

Dear "toofasteddie" i think you should really compared your BTC-GRC rates to the Dollar-BTC rates. At the moment most of the crypto currency are coupled strongly coupled to the BTC value. So,

Hello, i would like to point out that a practical, widespread and usable crypto currency needs to fulfill 3 criteria: 1.) Low transaction cost - e.g. to buy a pizza without large addition costs 2.) Stable

Well, i only know about the german tech sites: Those are heise.de, computerbase, golem. I think one needs to be ready. Usually the comment section receives attention for a day and than its dead. The best

Okey, good to know. It seem that should have waited even longer with the Raspberry. This would move the performance in the region of 120 Points per watt.

Thank you. Unfortunatly it is not possible to integrate your data into my comparison since you used a different project. I think i would need to get hold of some other devices to expand the table.

Hi Jan, i tried to find you article but i was not successful. If you find it can you please post a link?

As stated in the table i paid 260€. I bought a Fujitsu Celsius Mobile H720 from Harlander (www.harlander.com) in Germany. It came with a 1 year limited warranty.

Well,... ... just this morning the Raspberry reached a RAC of 520. This does not change the numbers significant. I will let it run and maybe update the table if necessary.

To my best experience you need to run yoyo at least for 2 weeks until the RAC becomes stable. Iam runnig yoyo@home on the same device 24/7 since 2 weeks and the RAC is still rising. At the moment i prepare

I observed a similar behavior. The windows seems to stick to a fork a very long time. A reboot usually does fix this issue. I do not know if this is related to the issue of the low net weight.

100 GRC donated.