I am extremely glad to read in the proposal FULL OWNERSHIP of the IP. That was one of the aspect I did not like and I was not willing to accept based on the initial draft. I am for it! Also, I will go

HBD and HIVE will last for roughly 55 days...

My main concerns with this proposal are twofold. First, co-ownership of the IP is not the same as full control. If the DAO does not own the IP entirely, this may create future uncertainty and potential

Dear Brave, I do completely agree on the proposal and I will support it. I saw how many efforts you put on that, investing your time and money and I cannot be more favorable to an enhancement of the program.

I kindly ask you to discuss in a polite manner. Eventually, the intent, scope and extent of the proposal have not been clearly understood by yourself. As a new player, you will be merely pushed to stake

In some way, the necessity for other players to rent more is itself a more utility scenario. In any case it is true that Dave and the company are working hard in order to create more use cases and that

The decay is global not connected to the single rent/delegation.

Hello there! Thanks for your feedback. As a new player, what is your goal? If it is to earn, a minimum of investment is required anywhere. Money are not created for free (I mean, unless you are a sovereign

The impact on players will be minimal initially (20%) and everybody will have teh chance to slowly stake if they want to switch the approach. After one year the efficiency will be still higher than 50%.

Dear Crypto, thanks for your question. Based on the proposal, the idea is to have a GLOBAL decay not connected to when the SPS are rented or delegated. 80% initially, then 1% tapering. It will not affect

Glad we have come to a more acceptable draft!

🔧 Potential Compromise Amendments To summarize possible refinements based on community input: Delegation carve-out for new players: Delegated SPS retains 100% efficiency for accounts less than 3 months

Thank you all for the excellent feedback — I really appreciate the depth of analysis and the constructive tone from everyone. Let me address the key points collectively and outline some potential compromises

Maybe it could be worth to ask the team if it effectively will have a deep impact on dev hours of coding. I will do it.

Thank you for your thoughtful comment — I completely understand your point. You’re right that even seemingly simple implementations can take time, and I respect that the dev team has to prioritize carefully.

Thank you for your feedback — even if critical, it’s genuinely appreciated. My intention was to design something that isn’t development-heavy and remains simple to implement. I agree that the initial impact

Very smart move that I support 100%! Let's prepare for the winter with stables

Let's go!

Thanks a lot, Clay!! 🙏 As you know, I am a strong supporter of holistic and organic sustainable solutions, and you definitely have my full support on this. I would just like to raise one point: I think

Great breakdown! I really appreciate how you clarified the SPS pricing — especially the point that it’s not a true “discount”, but simply the gap between the current market price and the implied $0.0143/SPS