The only blog post I've written on Steemit was about Bitconnect back in October because it was such an obvious and flagrant scam:

No, it's not a waste of tax payer money to try to pass legislation. Passing legislation is their job. It would be self defeating to give up on their duty to pass laws for the benefit of their constituency

Love the 3/2 poly rhythm at about a minute in. Also, he gives it a very full poly tonal sound by playing out a bass line and a melodic line at times, as well as nice rolling arpeggios . Very well played.

Update: The shit finally hit the fan: Texas regulators seemed to largely echo many of my major concerns above according to this article about their cease and desist letter: “BitConnect has disclosed virtually

Interesting. I believe you or another author pointed out fake website traffic likely paid for to jack up the website rank(ie Alexa). One possibility is that they are also trying to spam Google's Pagerank

Charlestines.com is correct. Since the loans are pegged at the initial loan amount in $USD for the term, the lender is paid a percent of the initial dollar value. The staker is paid a percent of BCC. So

Sorry for the delay. I haven't forgotten about your great investigative work, I've just been under the weather recently. The math appears reasonable. Even the use of ranges and estimation seems fine with

"My trading Bot - that either doesn't exist" This. What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. If there is a bot like thing at all, I believe it is used for BCC price

It looks like coinmarketcap changed the available supply to reflect that about 70% isn't in circulation. This seems consistent with removal of the CryptoID data you found showing the concentration of wealth

"But if Bitconnect is a scam it should be in this code, that's observable to anyone." Unfortunately, I think this key assumption of yours is erroneous. Can a Ponzi/Pyramid scheme be run with

You could try compiling from the the src folder, and see what you get (probably nothing but a bunch of errors). You are definitely correct about the lack of source code development. However, there are

You could try compiling from the the src folder, and see what you get (probably nothing but a bunch of errors). You are definitely correct about the lack of source code development. However, there are

Following the recent price surge: It's like blowing a balloon. You blow air into the balloon to inflate it, but you don't breathe that air back out from the balloon because you'd never make progress inflating

This is from last night 10/25/17 @ 8 PM This is from this morning minutes before this post: So, it appears that the vanishing of addresses peaked out in between these two times. Note that bitcoin surged

I completely agree regarding the reliability of the sources. The increase in addresses seems correlated to the pump phase. It appears that sharp decreases occur when the BCC/USD price gets too low, to

I predict we will see the number of active addresses start to come down very soon if the BTC correction continues post-BTCgold fork. If this occurs, it will be consistent with these temporary addresses

This is pretty interesting. Using the experimental wallet feature at CryptoID it appears that there are over 184,835 addresses it believes are associated to this wallet. I think the deposit pattern is

Also, I don't know if you've noticed this already, or if I'm missing something. I started comparing Coinmarketcap data (in $USD) to the block chain data on CryptoID (in BCC) by converting with an appropriate

I don't think loan balances adequately explain the movement. Since, as you noted, there is a 300 day maturity period. I would expect that loans would mature on a rolling basis. The daily amount of loan