Great to see that we are thinking about a sustainable distribution of rewards. I would like to see a system where SPS won by players is taken from the players that they have beaten. House bots would not

With respect, the arrangement seems to have been mutually agreed between SL & DAO and if SL company no longer wants DAO HP then why don't they just ask the DAO to end it. Unless I am missing something

In response to your follow up I would first like to remind that the rental market was set up when SPS replaced CP as a playing requirement. The staked SPS requirement was deliberately set at levels that

This is a over simplified attempt to apply economic theory to a system that has much more complexity than buying and selling commodities. Players need SPS to increase returns for winning ranked battles.

This proposal has put a knee on his throat. It is hard to think that there will not be permanent resentment for the embarrassment and deep cracks in the relationship between the DAO and DC. Assuming that

Month after month Aggy pumped the crap out of land (land is for whales) and then did a vanishing trick leaving a pod of disgruntled whales.

It's weird how this love affair between SPL and the DAO seemingly works. Looking in from the outside it is hard to distinguish between who is the boss and who is the slave. If SPL wants money from the

Your view is valid in my opinion but for me I would be considering voting NO for this proposal after now getting used to the current system. With the league system players that play by the rules and do

Can we set the burn value of the card really high so that the price will always be high or if it gets burnt it will get really scarce?

IDC I talk too much anyways.

The number of times and places that you want to repeatedly stick your head in you are the one with an agenda. The way you are posturing yourself it looks like you want to be the next CEO and I would fully

It is really a proposal to stage tournaments that payout in GP and the DAO pays for it.

This is a really honest commentary from an experienced player that has expressed so many thoughts and feelings on how the patterns of game modernization and mechanics are hostile to card owners or investors

Going back to one game mode is not likely to occur. The SPL developers need to sell packs to pay the expenses and the dual game mode is designed to ensure demand for packs. The game needs developers and

I like this summary. The biggest rewards in the game is strongly biased toward the top end players playing modern. These players are crying crocodile tears that there is not enough liquidity. There is

Oh no I am just an observer of what everyone can see.

The longer there is a denial of all of the problems that the current system creates the worse it will get. How many weeks has it been that it is not a problem and it will sort itself out? A big high to

The current exploit of maxing just one or two splinters with the lowest cost cards to get easy wins over evenly assembled lower level decks takes much of the fun out of the game. No one enjoys getting

Before I refer anyone to this "play to earn game" I would like to hear from anyone who has actually made a fist full of dollars other than the development team. I know of a whole bunch of players

Don't hold back lads this has been a very entertaining read. Just ease off on the down votes it not in the spirit of things.