Effect of your crusade against responsible citation is predictable: people would distort original material, misrepresent its origin, and avoid giving attribution -- all that will only exacerbate problems

Apparently there is a #posh initiative to encourage posting links to Hive content on other social media platforms for reward. But posting links to content outside of Hive is punished by blocklisting??

Regarding, "It takes seconds...", "no-effort posting...", how much effort should be involved, exactly? Even trivial post may be difficult to compose for someone with poor health,

One more thing: when I post such videos, I add appropriate tags, as per content of videos which I check prior to posting. It takes much more than "seconds" to prepare post for publication like

What if I want to share something without adding noise or my redundant commentary? What if I want to invite conversation by introducing content to discuss first, without my opinion which I will share in

Posting bare unannotated link (URL) would be "Copy/Paste abuse"; Raw text copied from external source without attribution would be abuse. But when raw text is cited with proper attribution and

IMHO it is a little more than "shame compilations". It is a transparency report of Hivewatchers' activities, and methods. Unfortunately, on this instance they've gotten some false-positives (or

This is outrageous. Regarding "Copy/Paste 'abuse'" attributed to me [1][2][3], I have several things to say. I was targeted by haters who tried to cancel me by downvoting everything I posted

I did leave a comment to explain: It is fair to upvote when you like something and downvote when you don't. You downvoted my post not on merit by as revenge, which I think is wrong. If you think that posts

Why would you downvote original content of mine (other post)?? Stop that ridiculously vindictive aggression.

Be polite! You complain about irresponsible downvoting yet now aggressing on me with series of unprovoked downvotes and insults? What's the matter with you? Originality of content is not the greatest virtue.

I did that once, and I see nothing wrong with downvoting reactions. It is not a kindergarten where everyone is given praise and participation award. Sometimes negative feedback is warranted. If you upvote,

I'm not sure I'd be willing to participate on Hive unless I can share work of a certain interesting authors who are not active on Hive themselves. (Interesting thought: is quoting authors who are no longer

Thanks. I'm still new to Hive and have little understanding of how its reputation system works...

Sharing link to something interesting is invitation for discussion. Suppose I am to share a quote from famous philosopher -- my commentary may be considered unimportant or selfish but either way it would

Discovery of original content is the same as curation. Originality of content is of little value, unless you appreciate selfies and cat videos over everything else. It is hardly possible to talk about

Let my clarify few things, @shaidon. Although it may have been phrased needlessly harsh (after your revenge-downvoting), I gave you explanation. It was because your selfie video of no particular importance

Indeed Death Note entertains viewers with intriguing moral dilemmas, but there is no question whether protagonist is evil or not: he is undeniably evil. He kills without hesitation, he kills innocents,

Monster is awesome but it is not as cruel or emotionally manipulative as more recent shows. IMHO Monster is also intellectually satisfying, with interesting and intriguing moral dilemmas. Its dark overtone

Death Parade is actually quite awesome, with intriguing moral dilemmas and interesting "gaming" approach to problem of understanding/assessment of human nature. Plus, opening theme is so cool!