Login
Discover
Waves
Decks
Plus
Login
Signup
Statsplit
@statsplit
54
Using numbers irresponsibly
Followers
90
Following
0
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Created
September 12, 2017
RSS Feed
Subscribe
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
statsplit
model-madness
2019-03-20 01:52
RE: Model Madness 2019 - The EDM Bracket (Part 1)
Sure, granted data gets more sparse the further back you get into time. Advanced statistics in the sports realm as only really gotten popular in the last twenty years. But given large amounts of time to
$ 0.000
1
1
statsplit
model-madness
2019-03-02 16:58
RE: Model Madness 2019 - Elo Ratings
It does a decent enough jobs for team sports, but it definitely works better at the individual level.
$ 0.000
0
statsplit
model-madness
2019-03-02 16:57
RE: Model Madness 2019 - Elo Ratings
Chess uses the constant of 400 based on a suggestion by Elo that a difference of 200 between players should correspond with an expected score of 0.75 for the better player. 400 is a round number that achieves
$ 0.000
1
statsplit
steemfield
2018-12-30 05:04
RE: Steemfield FINAL Results
Also, please take back your delegations as the game is now over.
$ 0.000
0
statsplit
steemfield
2018-12-19 00:46
RE: Steemfield Round 16 Results
This would occlude meta-rule #5, right?
$ 0.000
0
statsplit
steemfield
2018-12-18 01:07
RE: Steemfield Round 15 Results
@rollthedice for @bengiles
$ 0.000
0
1
statsplit
steemfield
2018-12-18 01:07
RE: Steemfield Round 15 Results
@rollthedice for @carn
$ 0.000
0
1
statsplit
steemfield
2018-12-18 01:06
RE: Steemfield Round 15 Results
@rollthedice for @kipswolfe
$ 0.000
0
1
statsplit
steemfield
2018-12-14 22:55
RE: Steemfield Round 15 Official Proposal
Nice!
$ 0.000
0
statsplit
steemfield
2018-12-14 22:55
RE: Steemfield Round 15 Official Proposal
Just testing things out: @rollthedice
$ 0.000
0
2
statsplit
steemfield
2018-12-13 03:20
RE: Steemfield Round 14 Results
What if players don't roll?
$ 0.000
0
1
statsplit
steemfield
2018-12-02 01:00
RE: Steemfield Round 10 Results
It's fine. Maybe there's some small semantic case I'm not thinking of.
$ 0.000
0
statsplit
steemfield
2018-12-01 00:08
RE: Steemfield Round 10 Results
Is the second sentence a little redundant? I'm curious why you included it.
$ 0.000
0
2
statsplit
steemfield
2018-11-20 01:53
RE: Steemfield Round 6 Results
It looks like you might have found a loophole. Hmmm...
$ 0.000
1
statsplit
steemfield
2018-11-16 00:59
RE: Steemfield Round 5 Results
sneaky...
$ 0.000
0
statsplit
steemfield
2018-11-16 00:57
RE: Steemfield Round 5 Results
You could also REPLACE rule #5 since you're basically overwriting it. Unless you have a reason to keep the prior rule...
$ 0.000
0
1
statsplit
steemfield
2018-11-16 00:52
RE: Steemfield Round 5 Results
Since the LAND is rounded down prior to subtraction, a player will never reach zero LAND via this mechanism. That being said other future mechanisms could bring this into play if that's what you're going
$ 0.000
0
statsplit
steemfield
2018-11-11 01:47
RE: Steemfield Round 4 Official Proposal
You're right in that the selection of the official proposal is out of the player's hands, but I'm not selecting the proposals arbitrarily. I selected your proposal as yours was the only one from a player
$ 0.000
1
statsplit
steemfield
2018-11-06 01:09
RE: Steemfield Round 2 Results
This was completely intentional.
$ 0.000
0
statsplit
steemfield
2018-11-06 00:29
RE: Steemfield Round 2 Official Proposal
First, the selection process favors those who have less proposals than other proposals. Since there were folks that had zero successful proposals, anyone who had a successful proposal was eliminated. Second,
$ 0.000
0