Excellent post, thank you sir!

Thanks @unitmaster !! Very cool to see that sleek Vette!

Great idea!

Key point: $4 (4000 DEC) / pack price is an artifact born during the last crypto bullrun ATH, when battle rewards from SPL were $5-$8 per battle and rewards cards were NFTs with RFLs selling for $50 /

$1 packs is the way.

Thanks for the shoutout! "VV dip" haha

Very cool idea and seems spot on. Even as one who doesn't care much for aesthetics, it is a nice touch which can definitely help share the excitement with newbs or friends engaged with the game. Not only

YES! We need KTGMFA (Kitchen Table Game Mode For All) launched! Ghost card challenges is step 1, customization of challenge setup is Step 2. With Step 2, 3rd party developers can use Challenge APIs to

At the time SPS white paper was written, the player base was similar size to today. The problem is not purely 3B total token supply, it is demand relative to that supply. Why not stretch out, or hold back,

*for use on US exchanges

I can only support such option with the commitment of DAO funds funding the ETH pool. It is the primary on/off for me because I'm US based. Bridge fees have become too expensive to start at BNB and make

Agree with Dave here. Also, this implementation seems like a 95% copy of the previous burn event - what is the need for $100k? Is it to pay for developers? Or is the DAO essentially buying the SPL asset

Great post, thanks!! What are your thoughts regarding Yabapmatt's comments: removing SPS rewards from Land in Land 2.0?

This is well thought out and addresses the issues for guilds like mine, TeamPossible, choosing to stay in Tier 3 even though we should be Tier 4 or even possibly competitive in Tier 5. Thanks for the thought

Thanks for recap. All for the gamejam!! What is the process of DAO approving release of funds?

Weird world could come to pass -- the way to HIVE is through SPS LPs on ETH and BSC chains! I am very curious how HIVE plans to resolve this. I came here through Splinterlands, so I do not know the ins

Great post, thanks for sharing your thoughts and continuing to be a community leader.

Many have discussed this point. One idea: have a one-account = one-vote mechanism in addition to Staked SPS. This would work with the current KYC program launched for KYC tournaments. KYC account = 1 vote.

Great stuff - thank you @rivalzzz @louis88 @primersion !!! This has been needed for a while and is just the beginning. Next up: status of all SPS distribution pools per whitepaper. Information to answer

"Absurd numbers unchanged" actually, it was changed. It was lowered from SPS Whitepaper.