Just because you think this would be unfair acquired mag doesn't mean that it's the case. Everyone had the chance to crunch the sourcefinder workunits, if more people had done so the mag would be more split, thats right.
Right now sourcefinder is contributing 130 to my Mag, and this also wasn't easy as there were several problems with the workunits.
Still i would vote for delist sourcefinder (let's wait for the greylist proposal).
But your attitude and this post really make me want to vote against the delisting.
You are not even comparing this with those sourcefinder crunchers who vote for the delisting, you are not comparing it with anything.
All you do is pointing out some individuals for their choice in a democratic process, because it's different from your choice.
You also didn't do this for accessability, all this data is EASY accessible on gridcoinstats.eu.
So yes, this is a witchhunting post and it should be flagged.
RE: Where did the "keep SourceFinder" voters make their magnitudes?