So under this proposed allocation, both the RF and the GF amounts INCREASE? Where is the SPS coming from then? It feels like the math is off if both of the amounts are increasing....

You convinced me with the cute kitten, regardless of any other factors!

I think I'm going to have to vote "no" here. I agree it's a problem, but this is a band-aid that obfuscates the underlying issue. The problem exists in higher leagues (silver/gold/diamond) as

When you refer to "Silver League play" are you only talking about Wild Ranked and Modern Ranked? Or will parts of this proposal affect tournaments (Novice/Bronze tournaments) or brawls (Novice/Bronze

#1. @clayboyn @eldon1 If this were a single issue proposal (which it is not, as @jacekw has pointed out), it could be structured as: Which formats should be supported in tournaments? And the proposal would

While there are certainly some positive steps incorporated here, I think there are too many flaws with this proposal. As a result, I plan to vote "no" so that the proposal can continue to get

This post is KITTY APPROVED! MEOW!

Wow you really like distorting things and then trying to mock people who have different views than you. Where did I say that I know "dozens of them?" In fact, I specifically said "I can

I can think of half a dozen methods to help identify battle helper use. For obvious reasons it wouldn't be prudent to just publicly state them, especially to a bot and battle helper developer, since it

Yes I CAN.

Splinterlands is a game, like traditional CCG's/TCG's or traditional computer games, only with a web3 component. Other card games (whether it be Magic or Pokemon), chess, and esports (whether it be League

I forgot to add: If you agree with any of my positions, please consider voting YES on proposal #8470

@splinterbank Sure, I would be happy to. First off, I strongly disagree with "the problem with prohibiting gameplay assistance is that it skews the incentives too much in favour of skilled players

These are the comments I previously posted on @davemccoy 's initial proposals: These are my personal thoughts as a player (not as a team member). The two proposals (“SPS Governance Proposal: Update Terms

These are my personal thoughts as a player (not as a team member). The two proposals (“SPS Governance Proposal: Update Terms Of Service To Prohibit Use Of Battle Helpers in Modern Ranked, Tourneys, and

These are my personal thoughts as a player (not as a team member). The two proposals (“SPS Governance Proposal: Update Terms Of Service To Prohibit Use Of Battle Helpers in Modern Ranked, Tourneys, and

I think I'm going to vote against this proposal because of the rushed and atypical timeline. I think a better alternative proposal is just to ask that 2000 Vruzes be minted for the DAO because it was unable

@peakmonsters @jarvie This proposal has passed with 98% of the vote. As per the terms of the proposal, the Dao has already sent 1 SPS to peakmonsters:

My main concern is how this fits into the promo card schedule. As previously mentioned in a town hall by Aggy, we finally settled into a system of 4 promo cards a year (around one per 3 months on average).

For example, if the proposal was simply: "We propose reducing the amount of SPS allocated for Staking in the whitepaper and reallocating it to the Dao instead," couldn't we essentially achieve